=================================
Tips for performance optimization
=================================

  This file provides tips for troubleshooting slow or wasteful fuzzing jobs.
  See README for the general instruction manual.

1) Keep your test cases small
-----------------------------

This is probably the single most important step to take! Large test cases do
not merely take more time and memory to be parsed by the tested binary, but
also make the fuzzing process dramatically less efficient in several other
ways.

To illustrate, let's say that you're randomly flipping bits in a file, one bit
at a time. If you flip bit #47, you will hit a security bug; flipping any
other bit just results in an invalid document.

If your starting test case is 100 bytes long, you will have a 71% chance of
triggering the bug within the first 1,000 execs - not bad! But if the test case
is 1 kB long, the probability that we will randomly hit the right pattern in
the same timeframe goes down to 11%. And if it has 10 kB of non-essential
cruft, the odds plunge to 1%.

On top of that, with larger inputs, the binary may be now running 5-10x times
slower than before - so the overall drop in fuzzing efficiency may be easily
as high as 500x or so.

In practice, this means that you shouldn't fuzz image parsers with your
vacation photos. Generate a tiny 16x16 picture instead, and run it through
jpegtran or pngcrunch for good measure. The same goes for most other types
of documents.

There's plenty of small starting test cases in ../testcases/* - try them out
or submit new ones!

If you want to start with a larger, third-party corpus, run afl-cmin with an
aggressive timeout on that data set first.

2) Use a simpler target
-----------------------

Consider using a simpler target binary in your fuzzing work. For example, for
image formats, bundled utilities such as djpeg, readpng, or gifhisto are
considerably (10-20x) faster than the convert tool from ImageMagick - all while
exercising roughly the same library-level image parsing code.

Even if you don't have a lightweight harness for a particular target, remember
that you can always use another, related library to generate a corpus that will
be then manually fed to a more resource-hungry program later on.

3) Use LLVM instrumentation
---------------------------

When fuzzing slow targets, you can gain 2x performance improvement by using
the LLVM-based instrumentation mode described in llvm_mode/README.llvm. Note
that this mode requires the use of clang and will not work with GCC.

The LLVM mode also offers a "persistent", in-process fuzzing mode that can
work well for certain types of self-contained libraries, and for fast targets,
can offer performance gains up to 5-10x.

4) Have a closer look at the binary
-----------------------------------

Check for any parameters or settings that obviously improve performance. For
example, the djpeg utility that comes with IJG jpeg and libjpeg-turbo can be
called with:

  -dct fast -nosmooth -onepass -dither none -scale 1/4

...and that will speed things up. There is a corresponding drop in the quality
of decoded images, but it's probably not something you care about.

In some programs, it is possible to disable output altogether, or at least use
an output format that is computationally inexpensive. For example, with image
transcoding tools, converting to a BMP file will be a lot faster than to PNG.

With some laid-back parsers, enabling "strict" mode (i.e., bailing out after
first error) may result in smaller files and improved run time without
sacrificing coverage; for example, for sqlite, you may want to specify -bail.

If you are still stumped, you can use strace -tt or an equivalent profiling
tool to see if the targeted binary is doing anything unnecessarily slow.
Sometimes, you can speed things up simply by specifying /dev/null as the
config file, or disabling some compile-time features that aren't really needed
for the job (try ./configure --help). One of the notoriously resource-consuming
things would be calling other utilities via exec*(), popen(), system(), or
equivalent calls; for example, tar can invoke external decompression tools.
Some programs may also intentionally call sleep(), usleep(), or nanosleep();
vim is a good example of that.

In programs that are slow due to unavoidable initialization overhead, you may
want to try the LLVM deferred forkserver mode (see llvm_mode/README.llvm),
which can give you speed gains up to 10x, but needs to be used with care.

Last but not least, if you are using ASAN and the performance is unacceptable,
consider turning it off for now, and manually examining the generated corpus
with an ASAN-enabled binary later on.

5) Instrument just what you need
--------------------------------

Instrument just the libraries you actually want to stress-test right now, one
at a time. Trying to simultaneously instrument glibc, zlib, gmp, OpenSSL,
and libxml2 to test a single program is an overkill.

Beware of programs that come with oddball third-party libraries bundled with
their source code (Spidermonkey is a good example of this). Check ./configure
options to use non-instrumented system-wide copies instead.

6) Parallelize your fuzzers
---------------------------

The fuzzer is designed to need ~1 core per job. This means that on a, say,
4-core system, you can easily run four parallel fuzzing jobs with relatively
little performance hit. For tips on how to do that, see parallel_fuzzing.txt.

The afl-gotcpu utility can help you understand if you still have idle CPU
capacity on your system. (It won't tell you about memory bandwidth, cache
misses, or similar factors, but they are less likely to be a concern.)

7) Keep memory use and timeouts in check
----------------------------------------

If you have increased the -m or -t limits more than truly necessary, consider
dialing them back down.

For programs that are nominally very fast, but get sluggish for some inputs,
you can also try setting -t values that are more punishing than what afl-fuzz
dares to use on its own. On fast and idle machines, going down to -t 5 may be
a viable plan.

The -m parameter is worth looking at, too. Some programs can end up spending
a fair amount of time allocating and initializing megabytes of memory when
presented with pathological inputs. Low -m values can make them give up sooner
and not waste CPU time.

8) Check OS configuration
-------------------------

There are several OS-level factors that may affect fuzzing speed:

  - High system load. Use idle machines where possible. Kill any non-essential
    CPU hogs (idle browser windows, media players, complex screensavers, etc).

  - Network filesystems, either used for fuzzer input / output, or accessed by
    the fuzzed binary to read configuration files (pay special attention to the
    home directory - many programs search it for dot-files).

  - On-demand CPU scaling. The Linux 'ondemand' governor performs its analysis
    on a particular schedule and is known to underestimate the needs of
    short-lived processes spawned by afl-fuzz (or any other fuzzer). On Linux,
    this can be fixed with:

    cd /sys/devices/system/cpu
    echo performance | tee cpu*/cpufreq/scaling_governor

    On other systems, the impact of CPU scaling will be different; when fuzzing,
    use OS-specific tools to find out if all cores are running at full speed.

  - Suboptimal scheduling strategies. The significance of this will vary from
    one target to another, but on Linux, you may want to make sure that the
    following options are set:

    echo 1 >/proc/sys/kernel/sched_child_runs_first
    echo 1 >/proc/sys/kernel/sched_autogroup_enabled

    Setting a different scheduling policy for the fuzzer process - say
    SCHED_RR - can usually speed things up, too, but needs to be done with
    care.

9) If all other options fail, use -d
------------------------------------

For programs that are genuinely slow, in cases where you really can't escape
using huge input files, or when you simply want to get quick and dirty results
early on, you can always resort to the -d mode.

The mode causes afl-fuzz to skip all the deterministic fuzzing steps, which
makes output a lot less neat and makes the testing a bit less in-depth, but
it will give you an experience more familiar from other fuzzing tools.
